Why you cannot divide by zero
Tonight's idea
Division undoes multiplication. \(12 \div 3 = 4\) because \(4 \times 3 = 12\). Every division is a question in disguise: what number times 3 makes 12?
Now try \(12 \div 0\). The question becomes: what number times 0 makes 12? But any number times 0 is 0, never 12. No number answers the question. Zero does not work either, since \(0 \times 0\) is 0, not 12.
What about \(0 \div 0\)? The question is: what number times 0 makes 0? Now every number works. 5 works, and so does 73. A question with every possible answer is no more use than a question with none.
\(a \div b\) means the one number that, multiplied by \(b\), gives \(a\). When \(b = 0\) there is no such number (if \(a\) is not 0) or there are too many (if \(a\) is 0). So dividing by zero is undefined: it has no meaning, because no meaning works.
Watch one: creep up on zero
Perhaps the answer is "infinity". Divide 12 by smaller and smaller numbers and watch.
| Divide 12 by | 1 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | or by | −1 | −0.1 | −0.01 | −0.001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | 12 | 120 | 1,200 | 12,000 | −12 | −120 | −1,200 | −12,000 |
From the positive side the answers grow without limit. From the negative side they fall without limit. The two sides head in opposite directions, so they cannot agree on a value at 0. And infinity is not a number. It is a way of saying "this never stops growing".
Your turn
- Turn each division into a "what number times …" question, then answer it. (a) \(20 \div 5\) (b) \(0 \div 7\) (c) \(7 \div 0\) (d) \(0 \div 0\)
- (a) Work out \(6 \div 0.5\), \(6 \div 0.01\), \(6 \div (-0.01)\) and \(6 \div (-0.5)\). (b) Without a calculator, what is \(6 \div 0.000001\)?
- Each of these has no value for exactly one value of \(x\). Find it. (a) \(5 \div (x - 3)\) (b) \(8 \div (x + 4)\) (c) \(1 \div (2x - 10)\)
- Here is a "proof" that 1 = 2. Line 1: \(1 \times 0 = 2 \times 0\). Line 2: divide both sides by 0. Line 3: \(1 = 2\). Which line is wrong? Explain what goes wrong, using the idea that division undoes multiplication.
Stretch: invent a number
Suppose we invent a new number \(N\) and declare \(12 \div 0 = N\). Then \(N \times 0 = 12\). But \(0 + 0 = 0\), so \(N \times 0 = N \times (0 + 0)\). Expand the bracket. What impossible statement do you reach?
Answers
- (a) What number times 5 makes 20? 4. (b) What number times 7 makes 0? 0, and only 0. So \(0 \div 7 = 0\) is fine. (c) What number times 0 makes 7? None: undefined. (d) What number times 0 makes 0? Every number: undefined.
- (a) 12, 600, −600, −12. (b) 6,000,000. Dividing by a millionth is the same as multiplying by a million.
- The divisor must be 0. (a) \(x = 3\). (b) \(x = -4\). (c) \(2x = 10\), so \(x = 5\).
- Line 2. Line 1 is true: both sides are 0. Dividing by 0 would mean working back to the number that was multiplied by 0. But multiplying by 0 turns every number into 0, so there is no way back: 0 could have come from 1, from 2, or from anything. This is the \(0 \div 0\) case, where every answer fits.
Stretch. \(N \times (0 + 0) = N \times 0 + N \times 0 = 12 + 12 = 24\). But it also equals \(N \times 0 = 12\). So \(12 = 24\). Inventing an answer for \(12 \div 0\) breaks ordinary arithmetic, which is why nobody does it.